The DA 2166 9 1 form is an official document used for the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for Sergeants in the U.S. Army. This form collects essential administrative data, performance evaluations, and potential assessments of NCOs. Completing this form accurately is crucial for reflecting an NCO's performance and career progression; fill it out by clicking the button below.
The DA 2166 9 1 form plays a crucial role in evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. This evaluation report is specifically designed for sergeants and serves as a formal method to assess their performance and potential. It encompasses various sections that require detailed information about the rated NCO, including personal data, duty descriptions, and performance evaluations. The form captures administrative data such as the NCO's name, rank, and unit, ensuring all relevant details are accurately recorded. Additionally, it includes sections for rater and senior rater authentication, which are essential for validating the evaluation process. The performance evaluation section focuses on key attributes such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each of these areas is assessed with clear metrics, allowing for a comprehensive view of the NCO's capabilities. The form also outlines the appeals process, ensuring transparency and accountability. Proper completion of the DA 2166 9 1 is vital, as it not only influences career progression but also reflects the Army's commitment to maintaining high standards of leadership and professionalism.
Employee Incident Report - Your participation in this process matters for future safety evaluations.
Printable Cash Count Sheet Excel - Offers a clear format for easy completion and review.
The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation is essential for assessing performance and potential for future assignments. It serves as a formal record of an NCO's achievements and areas for improvement.
The form is completed by the rater, who is typically the NCO's immediate supervisor. The senior rater, who is usually a higher-ranking officer, also provides input. In some cases, a supplementary reviewer may be involved to ensure the evaluation is thorough and fair.
Part I requires various administrative details, including:
In Part IV, the rater evaluates the NCO's performance across several categories, including:
Each category includes comments and a determination of whether the NCO met the standard.
The rated NCO has the right to sign the form, indicating they have seen the completed report. However, signing does not mean they agree with the evaluation. If there are disagreements, the NCO can follow the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3.
In Part V, the senior rater assesses the overall potential of the rated NCO compared to others in the same grade. The senior rater selects one of four options: Most Qualified, Highly Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified. This assessment helps determine future assignments and opportunities for the NCO.
Filling out the DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial step in the evaluation process for non-commissioned officers. This form requires accurate and thorough information to ensure a fair assessment. Below are the steps to help you complete this form effectively.
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other forms and documents are often used alongside it to support the evaluation process. Below is a list of these related forms.
These forms collectively support the evaluation process, helping to ensure that assessments are thorough and fair. Each document plays a specific role in capturing different aspects of a soldier's performance and potential.
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form. Both documents serve to evaluate and provide feedback on an individual’s performance. The DA Form 4856 is typically used for counseling sessions, which can be formal or informal. It captures the discussion points, goals, and follow-up actions, while the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses on a structured evaluation of an NCO’s performance over a specific period. Both forms require signatures from the rater and the individual being evaluated, ensuring accountability and clarity in the assessment process.
Another comparable document is the DA Form 67-9, the Company Grade Plate Officer Evaluation Report. This form assesses the performance and potential of officers in a similar way to how the DA Form 2166-9-1 evaluates NCOs. Both forms include sections for rater and senior rater comments, as well as a summary of the individual’s accomplishments and areas for improvement. The structure is similar, ensuring that evaluations are consistent across ranks within the Army, which helps maintain a standard of performance expectations.
The DA Form 2166-9-1 also shares similarities with the NCOER (Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report) forms, particularly the DA Form 2166-9-2. The 2166-9-2 is used for evaluations of NCOs at higher ranks, such as staff sergeants and above. Both forms assess leadership qualities, professional attributes, and performance metrics. The evaluation criteria are aligned, promoting a uniform approach to assessing NCO capabilities and potential across different levels of responsibility.
Additionally, the DA Form 7500, the Army Officer Evaluation Report (OER), is akin to the DA Form 2166-9-1. Both forms are used to document performance and potential, but the OER focuses on officers. They both require detailed descriptions of duties and responsibilities, as well as evaluations of leadership and effectiveness. The OER and NCOER processes are designed to ensure that all personnel are evaluated fairly and consistently, facilitating career progression based on merit.
The DA Form 703, known as the Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard, is another document that complements the DA Form 2166-9-1. While the 703 specifically records physical fitness test results, the 2166-9-1 incorporates these results into the overall evaluation of an NCO’s performance. Both forms emphasize the importance of physical fitness in military readiness and effectiveness, linking physical performance to overall job performance.
Lastly, the DA Form 2028, which is used for suggesting changes to Army publications, shares a procedural similarity with the DA Form 2166-9-1. Both forms require input and signatures from various levels of command, ensuring that feedback is collected and addressed appropriately. While the DA Form 2028 focuses on documentation changes, the 2166-9-1 centers on personnel evaluations, yet both are essential for maintaining effective Army operations and standards.